By Sam Coles:
Quake alongside Doom has to be one of my favourite first
person shooter franchises because the games have nothing to do with each other
except the name. However in 2005 Raven Software were tasked to make a direct
sequel to Quake II simply named Quake 4 and I often hear on the internet that
this game is bad and is the black sheep of the Quake series and I don’t
understand why. In my opinion this was one of the last traditional first person
shooters of the time before the modern military shooter took over.
The game takes place after the events of Quake II where a
lone space marine took down the Strogg leader and you play as Matthew Kane
where you go in and clear the rest of the Strogg out. A lot of people have a go
at this game due to the story which I would say you’re stupid if you’re
expecting a good story from early id software games because John Carmack was
dead against the heavy use of stories in games. Quake 4 has a basic set up and
lets you get on with it with very few interruptions.
Quake 4 like F.E.A.R was one of the last traditional first person
shooters of the era before regenerating health and linear corridors took over.
You go through each level completing objectives, finding new weapons and
picking up med kits and armour. The shooting in this game is fantastic with
great feedback from all the weapons, even the starting pistol has kick to it
which if you’ve played the new Doom games the pistol is usually effective as
harsh language. My favourite weapon has to be either the nail gun or the hyper
blaster with a high level of output as you destroy legions of enemies. Each
weapon has an upgrade such as being able to lock on with the nail gun to the
less fun scope on the machine gun.
Visually the game looks fantastic considering it came out
nearly 12 years ago and it’s a launch title for the Xbox 360, it was during
this time that games utilised dynamic lighting with games like F.E.A.R, Doom 3
and Far Cry which don’t see in games anymore. It does take a lot of aspects
from Doom 3 in terms of the presentation with dark corridors with nothing but a
faint light at the end of the tunnel, this can evoke some tension as you go
from all out gunfights to a slow paced and tense situation and it almost
becomes a horror game.
The only problem I had with this game was the performance
and I was playing this on the 360 so it might not apply to the PC version, the
game runs on an uncapped frame rate and this can vary from smooth to dips below
20 fps in busy segments. It doesn’t happen too often but it can kill the pace
when it does happen.
Quake 4 is a great game and I don’t understand why it gets
the negative attention it gets because it’s a solid shooter experience. If you
have a 360 or PC pick it up its super cheap these days and won’t break the
bank.
Thanks. :)
ReplyDeleteI was able to use the night scope of my best friend and it was literally an "eye opener" for me. I love the infrared light that makes seeing in the dark remarkable. Last week, we were on a hunting spree and I realized what a difference an excellent gear can make. So, this week , I've spent some time searching for a good night scope and was reading a lot of reviews. Hopefully, I can make up my mind on what to get by the end of the week. Here's an awesome site you've got to see: http://opticgearlab.com/night-vision/best-digital-night-vision-scope.html
ReplyDeleteIts a great pleasure reading your post.Its full of information I am looking for and I love to post a comment that "The content of your post is awesome" Great work. dating for gamers
ReplyDelete